vrijdag 30 juni 2023

Rabbiner Samson Raphael HIRSCH Aus seinem Kommentar zur Wochenabschnitt Chukass

 


Rabbiner Samson Raphael HIRSCH

חקת

Aus seinem Kommentar zur Wochenabschnitt Chukass

 

Kap. 19 V.21: והיתה להם לחקת עולם  Es ist dies ein noch für uns heute folgenreich bestehendes Gesetz. Da wir alle טמאי מת sind und aus Mangel an אפר פרה keine טהרה zu erlangen vermögen, schwebt noch heute כרת über jedem, der die Tempelstätte auf Moria im טומאה-Zustand betrifft. Mit der Zertrümmerung des Tempels hat die Stätte ihre Heiligkeit nicht verloren, קדושה ראשונה קדשה לשעתה וקדשה לעתיד לבא ( הל' בית הבחירה ,רמב"ם6,14; siehe jedoch ראב"ד  daselbst).

Die Ermordung Prof. Dr. De Haan’s (JPW 194, 28)

 Die Ermordung Prof. Dr. De Haan’s  (Jüdische Presse Wien 194, 28)

 

Bijlagen:
JPW 1924 28 Ermordung de Haan 2.JPG (108.9 KB)   
JPW 1924 28 Ermordung de Haan 3.JPG (50.4 KB)   
JPW 1924 28 Ermordung de Haan 4.JPG (82.7 KB)   
JPW 1924 28 Ermordung de Haan 5.JPG (33.1 KB)   
JPW 1924 28 Ermordung de Haan 6.JPG (82 KB)   
JPW 1924 28 Ermordung de Haan 7.JPG (103.2 KB)   
JPW 1924 28 Ermordung de Haan 8.JPG (55.4 KB)   

dinsdag 20 juni 2023

The Status Quo Agreement, and Why Agudah Didn’t Advocate Against a State


The Status Quo Agreement, and Why Agudah Didn’t Advocate Against a State

Recently the newspapers Hamodia (6/9/2021) and Yated Neeman (6/25/2021) have published accounts of the “Status Quo” agreement reached between Agudath Israel and the Zionists in summer of 1947, in which the Zionist leadership made four promises relating to religion in the state they planned to found, in exchange for Agudah’s commitment not to advocate against a state before the UN Special Committee on Palestine. The four items promised were: Shabbos would be the official day of rest in the state; all food in state institutions would be kosher; marriage and divorce would be under the guidance of the rabbinate, and the right to autonomous religious education would be guaranteed.

The two newspapers tell more or less the same story, and one surprising fact stands out. Most people who know this story are under the impression that the Agudah made a deal with the devil, so to speak: they promised not to prevent the state from coming into being, and got this compromise in return. However, the Hamodia and Yated articles say clearly that even before the deal, Agudah leader Yitzchok Meir Levin had decided not to speak either for or against a state, and claimed to have received instructions from the gedolim on this point.

[As we quote from various places, we will use the labels “Reason 1,2,3” etc. to keep track of the different reasons given as to why Agudah did not speak against the proposed state.]

Full Reading:

https://www.truetorahjews.org/status-quo-agreement-and-why-agudah-didn%E2%80%99t-advocate-against-state

 

 tags: 

Agudah

Partition Plan

United Nations

History

Rabbi Yosef Tzvi Dushinsky

 

„Gehe zum Frieden“

Rabbiner Dr. Mendel HIRSCH               (1833 – 1900)    Auszug aus dem Kommentar zur Haftoro des Wochenabschnittes TAZRIA   V.19...